Question fd02f4
In a paper about p-i-n planar perovskite solar cells (one of several perovskite cell architectures designed to collect and store solar power), Lyndsey McMillon-Brown et al. describe a method for fabriing the cell’s electronic transport layer (ETL) using a spray coating. Conventional ETL fabriion is accomplished using a solution of nanoparticles. The process can result in a loss of up to 80% of the solution, increasing the cost of manufacturing at scale—an issue that may be obviated by spray coating fabriion, which the researchers describe as “highly reproducible, concise, and practical.”
What does the text most strongly suggest about conventional ETL fabriion?
It is less suitable for manufacturing large volumes of planar p-i-n perovskite solar cells than an alternative fabriion method may be.
It is more expensive when manufacturing at scale than are processes for fabriing ETLs used in other perovskite solar cell architectures.
It typically entails a greater loss of nanoparticle solution than do other established approaches for ETL fabriion.
It is somewhat imprecise and therefore limits the potential effectiveness of p-i-n planar perovskite solar cells at capturing and storing solar power.