Question text-1
Text 1
Because literacy in Nahuatl script, the writing system of the Aztec Empire, was lost after Spain invaded central Mexico in the 1500s, it is unclear exactly how meaning was encoded in the script’s symbols. Although many scholars had assumed that the symbols signified entire words, linguist Alfonso Lacadena theorized in 2008 that they signified units of language smaller than words: individual syllables.
Text 2
The growing consensus among scholars of Nahuatl script is that many of its symbols could signify either words or syllables, depending on syntax and content at any given site within a text. For example, the symbol signifying the word huipil (blouse) in some contexts could signify the syllable “pil” in others, as in the place name “Chipiltepec.” Thus, for the Aztecs, reading required a determination of how such symbols functioned each time they appeared in a text.
Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely characterize Lacadena’s theory, as described in Text 1?
By praising the theory for recognizing that the script’s symbols could represent entire words
By arguing that the theory is overly influenced by the work of earlier scholars
By approving of the theory’s emphasis on how the script changed over time
By cautioning that the theory overlooks certain important aspects of how the script functioned
Text 1 Because literacy in Nahuatl script, the writing system of the Aztec Empire, was lost
Hard-difficulty · SAT Reading & Writing · Cross-Text Connections — Agree/disagree or support/challenge relationships. Read the question above, select your answer, and check the full explanation below to understand exactly why the correct choice works.
Answer explanation
Choice D is the best answer. Lacadena’s theory is that Nahuatl script symbols signified syllables, but the consensus described in Text 2 is that they can signify either symbols or full words, depending on the context. So the author of Text 2 would likely consider Lacadena’s theory too simplistic: it’s missing the importance of the context in determining the meaning of a symbol.
Choice A is incorrect. This conflicts with Text 1’s description of Lacadena’s theory. Lacadena’s theory is that Nahuatl script symbols signified syllables. Choice B is incorrect. This conflicts with Text 1’s description of Lacadena’s theory. Text 1 states that Lacadena’s theory differed from what earlier scholars believed. Choice C is incorrect. We can’t infer that this is how the author of Text 2 would characterize Lacadena’s theory. Neither text mentions how or even if the script changed over time.
More Cross-Text Connections practice questions
- Text 1 On April 26th, 1777, Sybil Ludington rode 40 miles by horse through
- Text 1 Ecologists have long wondered how thousands of microscopic phytoplankton species
- Text 1 Conventional wisdom long held that human social systems evolved in stages,
- Text 1 Italian painters in the 1500s rarely depicted themselves in their work. Even
- Text 1 Despite its beautiful prose, The Guns of August , Barbara Tuchman’s 1962
- Text 1 Like the work of Ralph Ellison before her, Toni Morrison’s novels feature
- Text 1 Public policy researcher Anthony Fowler studied the history of elections in
- Text 1 Most animals can regenerate some parts of their bodies, such as skin.
Browse all Craft and Structure practice questions or return to the full SAT question bank.