Question text-1
Text 1
Historians studying pre-Inca Peru have looked to ceramic vessels to understand daily life among the Moche people. These mold-made sculptures present animals, animals, and human faces in precise ways—vessels representing human faces are so detailed that scholars have interpreted facial markings to represent scars and other skin irregularities. Some historians have even used these objects to identify potential skin diseases that may have afflicted people at the time.
Text 2
Art historian and archaeologist Lisa Trever has argued that the interpretation of Moche “portrait” vessels as hyper-realistic portrayals of identifiable people may inadvertently disregard the creativity of the objects’ creators. Moche ceramic vessels, Trever argues, are artworks in which sculptors could free their imagination, using realistic objects and people around them as inspiration to explore more abstract concepts.
Based on the texts, what would Lisa Trever (Text 2) most likely say about the interpretation presented in the underlined portion of Text 1?
Some vessels may have been damaged during their excavation and thus provide little insight into Moche culture.
Markings on depictions of human faces are not necessarily intended to portray particular details about the physical appearance of individuals.
Depictions of human faces are significantly more realistic than depictions of animals and other animals are.
It is likely that some depictions of human faces with extensive markings are intended to portray the same historical individual.
Text 1 Historians studying pre-Inca Peru have looked to ceramic vessels to understand daily life among
Medium-difficulty · SAT Reading & Writing · Cross-Text Connections — Agree/disagree or support/challenge relationships. Read the question above, select your answer, and check the full explanation below to understand exactly why the correct choice works.
Answer explanation
Choice D is the best answer. Trever thinks that the “hyper-realistic portrayal of identifiable people” interpretation ignores the sculptors’ imagination and creativity. We can infer that Trevor thinks the facial markings on the sculptures may not have represented real skin blemishes on real people.
Choice A is incorrect. The text gives us no reason to think that Trever would respond to the underlined interpretation in this way. Neither text compares the depictions of human faces to the depictions of animals or animals, so we have no basis to draw this conclusion. Choice B is incorrect. The text gives us no reason to think that Trever would respond to the underlined interpretation in this way. There’s nothing in either text about multiple depictions representing the same person, so we have no basis to draw this conclusion. Choice C is incorrect. The text gives us no reason to think that Trever would respond to the underlined interpretation in this way. Neither text mentions the state of the vessels (damaged or intact), so we have no basis to draw this conclusion.
More Cross-Text Connections practice questions
- Text 1 On April 26th, 1777, Sybil Ludington rode 40 miles by horse through
- Text 1 Ecologists have long wondered how thousands of microscopic phytoplankton species
- Text 1 Conventional wisdom long held that human social systems evolved in stages,
- Text 1 Italian painters in the 1500s rarely depicted themselves in their work. Even
- Text 1 Despite its beautiful prose, The Guns of August , Barbara Tuchman’s 1962
- Text 1 Like the work of Ralph Ellison before her, Toni Morrison’s novels feature
- Text 1 Public policy researcher Anthony Fowler studied the history of elections in
- Text 1 Most animals can regenerate some parts of their bodies, such as skin.
Browse all Craft and Structure practice questions or return to the full SAT question bank.