Question a-pion

3.2 Form, Structure, and Sense - Modifier placement and clarity
0:00

A pioneer in the field of taphonomy (the study of how organic remains become fossils), blank may be just as prevalent in the fossil record as those of thick-shelled organisms.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A.

fossils of thin-shelled organisms, Anna Behrensmeyer demonstrated in a 2005 analysis,

B.

Anna Behrensmeyer demonstrated in a 2005 analysis that fossils of thin-shelled organisms

C.

it was demonstrated in a 2005 analysis by Anna Behrensmeyer that fossils of thin-shelled organisms

D.

a 2005 analysis—by Anna Behrensmeyer—demonstrated that fossils of thin-shelled organisms

A pioneer in the field of taphonomy (the study of how organic remains become fossils), ______

Hard-difficulty · SAT Reading & Writing · Form, Structure, and Sense — Modifier placement and clarity. Read the question above, select your answer, and check the full explanation below to understand exactly why the correct choice works.

Answer explanation

Choice B is the best answer. The convention being tested is subject-modifier placement. This choice makes the noun phrase “Anna Behrensmeyer” the subject of the sentence and places it immediately after the modifying phrase “a pioneer…fossils.” In doing so, this choice clearly establishes that Anna Behrensmeyer—and not another noun in the sentence—is a pioneer in the field of taphonomy.

Choice A is incorrect because it results in a dangling modifier. The placement of the noun phrase “fossils of thin-shelled organisms” immediately after the modifying phrase illogically suggests that the “fossils” are a pioneer in the field of taphonomy. Choice C is incorrect because it results in a dangling modifier. The placement of the pronoun “it” immediately after the modifying phrase illogically suggests that “it” is a pioneer in the field of taphonomy. Choice D is incorrect because it results in a dangling modifier. The placement of the noun phrase “a 2005 analysis” immediately after the modifying phrase illogically suggests that “a 2005 analysis” is a pioneer in the field of taphonomy.