Question while-

3.4 Rhetorical Synthesis - Selecting a claim supported by multiple findings
0:00

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:

  • Platinum is a rare and expensive metal.
  • It is used as a alyst for chemical reactions.
  • Platinum alysts typically require a large amount of platinum to be effective.
  • Researcher Jianbo Tang and his colleagues created a platinum alyst that combines platinum with liquid gallium.
  • Their alyst was highly effective and required only trace amounts of platinum (0.0001% of the atoms in the mixture).

The student wants to explain an advantage of the new platinum alyst developed by Jianbo Tang and his colleagues. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

A.

Platinum is a rare and expensive metal that is used as a alyst for chemical reactions; however, platinum alysts typically require a large amount of platinum to be effective.

B.

While still highly effective, the new platinum alyst requires far less of the rare and expensive metal than do other platinum alysts.

C.

Researcher Jianbo Tang and his colleagues created a platinum alyst that combines platinum, a rare and expensive metal, with liquid gallium.

D.

Like other platinum alysts, the new platinum alyst requires a particular amount of the metal to be effective. 

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes: Platinum is a rare and

Hard-difficulty · SAT Reading & Writing · Rhetorical Synthesis — Selecting a claim supported by multiple findings. Read the question above, select your answer, and check the full explanation below to understand exactly why the correct choice works.

Answer explanation

Choice D is the best answer. The sentence explains an advantage of Tang and his colleagues’ platinum alyst, noting that it requires far less platinum (which is rare and expensive) than other platinum alysts do.

Choice A is incorrect. The sentence describes the platinum alyst that Tang and his colleagues created; it doesn’t explain an advantage of their platinum alyst. Choice B is incorrect. The sentence emphasizes a similarity between the new platinum alyst and other platinum alysts; it doesn’t explain an advantage of the new platinum alyst. Choice C is incorrect. The sentence connects the metal platinum to the functioning of platinum alysts, noting that large amounts of platinum are typically required for platinum alysts to be effective; it doesn’t explain an advantage of Tang and his colleagues’ platinum alyst.